Low bid price survey / minimum limit price / central public contract model, spread to 40 prefectures / full-scale survey
In both the low bid price survey and the minimum limit price system operated by local governments, the calculation formula of the Central Public Construction Contract System Operation Liaison Council (Central Public Contract Federation) model that responds to the increase in the national general and administrative expenses ratio has become widespread. I've been doing it. According to the survey results of the National Construction Industry Association (Zenken, Chairman Takanori Okumura), 40 prefectures conform to the latest model or apply a calculation formula of the same level or higher. Expanding the spread to government-designated cities and cities where prefectural offices are located, which is only about half of the total, is likely to be an issue for the future.
The calculation formula model of the Central Public Contract Federation was revised in March. Similar to the calculation formula of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, which raised the general and administrative expenses ratio from "0.55" to "0.68" as part of dumping measures, "direct construction costs x 0.97 + common temporary costs x 0. 9 + site management fee x 0.9 + general management fee x 0.68 ".
For all buildings, 47 prefectures and 51 government-designated cities / prefectural offices are targeted, and the operational status of the low bid price survey system and the minimum limit price system is investigated through the prefectural construction industry association. The results as of July are summarized.
The prefectures that conform to the Central Public Contract Ren model and apply the calculation formula that exceeds the standard of the model are ▽ Aomori ▽ Akita ▽ Yamagata ▽ Kanagawa ▽ Shizuoka ▽ Fukui ▽ Wakayama ▽ Yamaguchi ▽ Ehime ▽ Miyazaki ▽ Kagoshima-11 prefecture. Yamaguchi Prefecture has abolished the low bid price survey and the setting range of the minimum limit price, and has shown a positive attitude toward dumping measures, such as setting the inclusion rate of general and administrative expenses to 70% and the direct construction cost to 100%. ing.
The four prefectures of ▽ Fukushima ▽ Nagano ▽ Tottori ▽ Saga-apply the original calculation formula of the same level or higher than the same model. The same calculation formula as the same model is ▽ Hokkaido ▽ Iwate ▽ Ibaraki ▽ Tochigi ▽ Gunma ▽ Saitama ▽ Chiba ▽ Tokyo ▽ Yamanashi ▽ Gifu ▽ Aichi ▽ Toyama ▽ Ishikawa ▽ Shiga ▽ Kyoto ▽ Osaka ▽ Nara ▽ Okayama ▽ Kagawa ▽ Tokushima ▽ Kochi ▽ It is applied to 25 prefectures of Fukuoka ▽ Nagasaki ▽ Kumamoto ▽ Oita. From October, Hyogo Prefecture will also introduce a calculation formula based on the same model.
Looking at the operational status of government-designated cities and cities where prefectural offices are located, 25 cities have reviewed the calculation formula based on the same model, which is only half of the total.
While the calculation formula is being reviewed, the setting range of the low bid survey standard price and the minimum limit price of the same model has not changed from the planned price of "75 to 92%". At the regional round-table conferences and block meetings with the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism held in nine districts nationwide in October last year, there have been a series of requests from the Construction Industry Association to abolish the upper limit of the set range, and future measures are drawing attention.
<< Low bid price survey of government-designated cities and cities where prefectural offices are located, revision status of minimum limit price >>
[Level higher than the latest model of Chuo Kokakuren] Sapporo △ Yokohama △ Kawasaki △ Niigata △ Kyoto △ Sakai △ Takamatsu △ Kochi
[Latest model of Chuo Koketsuren] Morioka △ Utsunomiya △ Chiba △ Sagamihara △ Kofu △ Shizuoka △ Hamamatsu △ Nagoya △ Toyama △ Kanazawa △ Otsu △ Osaka △ Wakayama △ Okayama △ Tokushima △ Kumamoto △ Oita
